T or F: If you get non-melskin analyzer magnifier machineanoma skin cancer…?

Home » Blog

…(e.g. skin cancer associated with cumulative sun exposure) you may have a greatly reduced risk of breast, colon, prostate and other sskin analyzer malaysiaolid…
show more
…(e.g. skin cancer associated with cumulative sun exposure) you may have a greatly reduced risk of breast, colon, prostate and other solid cancers.

Hints:
http://www.mercola.com/2004/feb/11/vitamin_d_types.htm
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/334/7607/1295-d
http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/16/3/422

Answer:
Maikang hi Dylan returned I see you’re out of the backyard now and you compost heap, and returned to well-being situations. My husband had maximum cancers 6 years in the past, Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, it somewhat is a maximum cancers of the blood, and somewhat an undemanding one too, luckily he have been given by using that and is now 6 years later out of remission. yet besides the two significant cancers one has a tendency to pay attention approximately at present, is breast maximum cancers for lady, nonetheless supposedly men can get that too, and the authentic maximum acceptable killer of path is Lung maximum cancers. one can’t say who will beat it, who won’t, in spite of Lung maximum cancers there remains an excellent gamble you will recover from that, it relies upon on how early the cancers of any part of the physique are got here upon. maximum cancers is graded a million-4. for sure having grade 4 provides little wish, yet we people can get well even from that. returned age performs a significant place managing maximum cancers, the extra youthful you’re, the better the physique is to combat returned, what with chemotherapy and radiology plus in many situations operations, a youthful individual has a larger threat of status as much as all that bombardation. yet in many situations one can’t say how long one individual would final with maximum cancers, as people all of us selection, yet as quickly as a individual is instructed they are terminal, then frequently via 2 years they are ineffective from this dreadful ailment. yet others together with a woman I met while my husband had maximum cancers, and alter into receiving chemo comparable time as he replace into, had had her maximum cancers come back 15 situations, and she or he replace into nevertheless going stable. you relatively sound like your very drawn to medical issues, are you learn in that potential, you will in all threat make a competent well-being practitioner. perfect desires Billie ukskin analyzer

Maikang Hi health a(ngel),

That was a really fascinating and provocative question you asked. It prods me to get more sun exposure, especially with the recent info regarding Vitamin D, the sun’s vitamin, and how it helps to reduce cancer in various parts of the body.

Thank you for that.

Good luck and be well.

Kelleyskin analyzer

Maikang it is the best cream for skin infections and damage the repair you have take care your skin he chances of skin cancer is very decreasedskin analyzer

Maikang No, not true, regardless of sun exposure or vitamin D intake. People with basal or squamous cell skin cancers have a higher rate of second malignancies than people who have never had a non-melanoma skin cancer.

Cancer Causes Control. 2000 Dec;11(10):891-7.
Association of basal cell skin cancers with other cancers (United States).Friedman GD, Tekawa IS.
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Oakland, California, USA. gdf@leland.stanford.edu

BACKGROUND: Persons with basal cell skin cancer (BCSC) have shown increased risk of developing cancer at several other sites. METHODS: We identified 3164 persons with BCSC and 15,730 comparison subjects matched for age, sex, race, residence area and length of membership in a health maintenance organization. RESULTS: In retrospective follow-up for up to 24 years (mean 11.3 years), BCSC patients experienced statistically significant increases in the incidence of all cancer (relative risk [RR] = 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-1.4) lung cancer (RR = 1.4, CI = 1.0-1.8) and melanoma (RR = 2.2, CI = 1.6-3.0). Women experienced significantly increased risk for all cancer, lung cancer, melanoma and thyroid cancer, increases of borderline significance in breast cancer, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and leukemia, and increased pre-existing bladder cancer. Men showed statistically significant increases in all cancer, melanoma, and kidney cancers, and mouth and throat cancers. Multivariate analyzer incorporating available risk factor data did not weaken positive associations with BCSC except slightly for melanoma and for bladder cancer in women. Other previously reported associations were not confirmed. CONCLUSION: Periodic skin examinations appear well justified after removal of BCSC to detect new skin cancers including melanoma. Given the relatively weak, unexplained associations of BCSC with internal cancers, the costs vs. benefits of extra efforts to detect the latter still need to be determined.
PMID: 11142523

Risk of subsequent cancer following invasive or in situ squamous cell skin cancer.Efird JT, Friedman GD, Habel L, Tekawa IS, Nelson LM.
Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5405, USA.

PURPOSE: Determine the risk of subsequent cancer following squamous cell skin cancer. METHODS: Using computerized surgical pathology records and membership data from a health maintenance organization, we retrospectively identified 822 individuals with primary squamous cell skin cancer (SCSC) and 3662 comparison subjects matched for age, sex, race, residence area, and length of membership. Patients were included in the study if they had no prior history of cancer, and received at least one multiphasic health checkup and questionnaire (MHC). Patients were followed for subsequent invasive cancer up to 24 years, with a mean follow-up time of 7.8 years. RESULTS: SCSC patients had a significantly greater risk [adjusted for body mass index (BMI) and education] for subsequent cancer overall (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) [risk ratio (RR) = 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-1.6], and for basal cell skin cancer (RR = 13.8, 95% CI = 8.8-21.9), digestive (RR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.1-2.4), and genitourinary cancers (RR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.0-2.0). An increased, but not statistically significant, adjusted risk (RR > or = 1.4) was also observed for lip, oral cavity, and pharynx cancer (RR = 3.9, 95% CI = 0.6-25.0); non-cutaneous squamous cell cancer (RR = 1.9, 95% CI = 0.9-4.4); and respiratory and intrathoracic cancer (RR = 1.4, 95% CI = 0.8-2.6). The addition of alcohol consumption, combined occupational exposure, marital status, and smoking history to the multivariate model did not materially change any significant positive associations with SCSC. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that patients diagnosed with SCSC may be at an increased risk of subsequent cancer at many sites, although several estimated risk estimates were within the limits of chance given no true association.
PMID: 12377424

Also, mercola.com is not an unbiased source of health information, hence the .com address. The info posted there is slanted towards alternative medicine.skin analyzer

CATEGORY AND TAGS: